US economy creates 'lower than expected' 96,000 jobs in August

London, Sat, 08 Sep 2012 ANI

London, Sep 8 (ANI): The American economy may have created 96,000 jobs in August, but the figure was lower

than the expected number, analysts have said.

A report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the United States, which reported about the 96,000 jobs, also claimed

that revisions to the June and July data meant that 41,000 fewer jobs were created than previously reported, BBC

reports.

Analysts had expected non-farm payrolls to grow by 125,000 last month.

The bureau said cited that the unemployment rate fell to 8.1%, compared with 8.3% in July, but only because more

people gave up looking for work.

Employment increased in food services and drinking places, professional and technical services and healthcare during August, the Bureau said.

The bureau also claimed that the employment growth has averaged 139,000 a month in 2012, compared with an

average monthly gain of 153,000 in 2011.

The weak figures could put pressure on President Barack Obama in his re-election campaign, given than rival Mitt

Romney has put jobs at the centre of the national debate, the report said. (ANI)



Read More: United Nations Volunteers | United nations | American Samoa | United Salt Work | Post Bureau Extn Counter | June Mohide | Bureau Of Mines | S.v.u. P.g .centre | L.s.farm | G.s.t.centre | K.p.centre | June Belgaum | Durgapur Dsp Sb Bureau | Durgapur Asp Sb Bureau | P.s.bureau | K.r.centre | Mitt Romney | Janata Dal (United) information | Euro 2012 | Who is Mitt Romney

LATEST IMAGES
Chandrababu Naidu talks to media after a meeting with President of India BJP Delhi president meets with MCD East Councilors ABVP protest against Chinese Premier visit to India Anand Sharma meets Zhi Shuping Anil Ambani and Hu Huaibang at India China CEOs Forum

Maoists beat woman to death in Jharkhand
May 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM
MORE...
Social bookmark this page



Post comments:
Your Name (*) :
Your Email :
Your Phone :
Your Comment (*):
  Reload Image
 
 

Comments: